Video soruce: InfoWars
If Comey's testimony taught us anything, it taught us that President Trump is still squeaky clean. James Comey confirmed that the President never obstructed any investigation, President Trump was never the subject of an investigation, and Russia changed no votes in the election.
Of course this didn't satisfy the liberal media, they quickly went into damage control, all but Chris Matthews who seemed to accept defeat. Matthews of MSNBC conceded that the "collusion" theory fell apart, which it did.
Here is Senator Risch pressing Comey on how Trump did not order Comey to stand down from the Flynn probe per PBS NewsHour:
The loss column just seemed to pile on for Democrats yesterday, not only did Comey confirm President Trump is good to go, but he also dropped a bombshell on former US Attorney General Loretta Lynch. Comey stated that Lynch directed him to call the Hillary Clinton server investigation a "matter" and not an investigation. That is clearly a wrong a doing, and helps back up the theory Comey and Obama Admin got Hillary off.
Comey also delivered another blow to the left by simply stating most media stories talking about classified info and the russia investigation are wrong. Here's the video of Comey stating that, per PBS NewsHour:
Thanks, Comey for confirming the fake media.
Comey however put himself in a negative light. He confirmed that he leaked his own memo. Yes, James Comey wrote a memo about President Trump, didn't do anything official with it, got fired, gave it to a source within the FBI, who then leaked it out to the press. Yes, Comey was part of a deep state leak, and can make you wonder if he was part of any other leaks.
Comey on multiple occasions, used language like "if i were strong enough" and "cowardly" when describing some of his actions. That doesn't shine positively on him at all, and helps confirm why Trump thought he was incompetent.
At the end of the day Comey handed the democrats a loss, handed Trump a win, and gave the media a free for all on both sides. Of course liberal media won't concede defeat this easy, but it sure gave them a kick in the ass. Hopefully they wise up, start being professional, and get back to real journalism.
It would be nice if we as a country can get passed this charade, and start talking about and working on the real issues that face our country. America First.
Yesterday, President Trump issued a notice of termination to FBI Director James Comey. Comey himself learned at an FBI event in Los Angeles, and thought it was a joke per The New York Times. No joke, Comey, you're done.
It was well deserved given that Comey let Hillary and other powerful democrats off the hook, and even tried providing more cover to Huma Abedin and Anothony Weiner when he "corrected" his statements he made under oath in front of Congress last week. Huma forwarded many classified emails to Weiner to "print" out, but to Comey that's no big deal.
Comey's incompetence and shadiness led to his firing, no one is to blame but himself. Even the Wall Street Journal is saying it was well deserved.
At any rate here are the Pulsar poll results on the support of the decision to fire James Comey:
The No's have it at 52%, with the Yes vote at 34%. Out of 67 votes, it's sort of surprising the No vote won, but 52% believe it was the wrong decision.
James Comey had it coming to him, and even the democrats and mainstream media wanted him ousted, and they finally got their wish, but it was President Trump who fired him. Since Trump did the firing the media and democrats immediately flipped their script and scream "Trump-Russia" and "Nixon", and act like Comey did nothing wrong.
Maybe if the FBI didn't chase the non-existent Trump-Russia collusion and prioritize actual real investigations, maybe Comey's reputation wouldn't be so negative. According to The Washington Post, the FBI prioritized the Trump-Russia investigation over intelligence leaks, and "resisted" investigating the intelligence leaks.
President Trump was right, Comey was unable to effectively lead the bureau. Senator Rand Paul agreed with Trump's decision, and even agrees that the FBI/Dems are pushing a "huge myth" about Trump-Russia collusion.
Here's a video of Rand Paul explaining his thoughts, per Fox Business:
God only knows what James Comey will do now, but it sure won't involve the federal government. Julian Assange of Wikileaks offered Comey a job though, per RT, maybe he can take that.
The Obama Administration seems to have been the real meddlers in the 2016 U.S presidential election, due to multiple actions taken by Obama staffers and even the former president himself. The week to date has been very eventful regarding this story.
It is looking more and more like the Obama Administration was up to no good during the 2016 presidential election. Susan Rice has been caught unmasking Trump officials names, and according to The Hill, Susan Rice declined to testify to Congress about that. Hey, Susan if you have nothing to hide, then why won't you testify? More than likely because Ms. Rice has plenty to hide, and will sit in front of Congress exercising her 5th Amendment right.
Yesterday though, Rice's friends Sally Yates, former acting Attorney General, and former NSA director James Clapper faced Congress. Yates and Clapper were testifying on Russian and Obama admin meddling in the 2016 election.
Really all we learned from Clapper and Yates, was Yates saying she warned the White House about Michael Flynn and his ties with Russia, and that her and Clapper knew about the unmasking and leaks, but were never the sources of them, per Axios. Also per The Gateway Pundit, Yates and Clapper refused to go into any details about the unmasking and leaks.
Brit Hume of Fox News sums up the testimony pretty well:
Sally Yates though is the most visible in the snake pit at the moment, not only due to her actions and testimony, but Judicial Watch has sued for Yates's emails during her time at the Department of Justice, per Politico. Judicial Watch should have no trouble with that FOIA request, and if they do get Yates's emails, watch out because it may be a treasure trove of what truly went on during the Obama admin in 2016.
If the recent events surrounding the Obama admin and meddling in the 2016 presidential election, Circa reported that President Obama mined the NSA during the 2016 election targeting U.S citizens. Circa cites the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. The report suggests President Obama illegally searches thousands of Americans digital records during the election year. Circa states that the government conducted 30,355 searches during the 2016 election year.
That has some very heavy weight attached to it.
Circa is also reporting that Senator Rand Paul (R-KY), has requested the Trump Administration to probe on whether or not him and other lawmakers were spied on by the NSA during the 2016 presidential election. This spying would almost directly tie in with Obama ordering NSA searches of Americans during the 2016 presidential election. Senator Paul received reports that suggested he was targeted by NSA spying.
If the probe goes forward, the Obama administration may be in serious trouble and charges may finally be filed against not just the former President, but against all the snakes within the Obama admin. President Trump certainly won't shy away from Rand Paul's request.
As more and more information mounts of Obama administration meddling in the 2016 election, no information is mounting on claims that Russia and the Trump campaign colluded in the 2016 election. According to Breitbart, yesterday James Clapper confirmed there is still no evidence that the Trump campaign and Russia colluded during the 2016 presidential election. It's over lefties, your the real snakes in the grass, deal with it.
Image Source: Slate
It's clear as day, President Trump is surrounded by those who want to destroy him. In all three branches of government, there are people who want President Trump and his agenda to fail.
Paul Ryan, for example, is missing the mark on pushing through Trump's agenda, Mitch McConnell hasn't been much help in the Senate either. The GOP is the biggest thorn in Trump's side at the moment with the constant failures and feuds.
For crying out loud, back in October 2016, Paul Ryan said himself he'll never support Donald Trump. Listen for yourself, per Breitbart News:
John McCain and Lindsey Graham were so critical of President Trump until the President bombed that Syrian airfield, makes you think huh? Out of all things Trump did prior and wanted to implement, "America First", GOP senators McCain and Graham applaud Trump for bombing Syria.
Then you have the GOP controlled House not being able to agree on healthcare because the GOP establishment refused to work with conservatives, and Paul Ryan sold Trump a bad bill.
The Chuck Schumer and the democrats obstruct every single nominee of President Trump, and now are vowing to shut the government down over border wall funding. President Trump should let the shut down happen, but what's worse is, according to The Gateway Pundit Paul Ryan wants to delay wall funding until 2018.
In that same article, the Border Patrol Union president was not very happy with that report. It just honestly seems like there is a coordinated attack on President Trump by both parties, but there are those in the GOP who are with Trump. People like Rand Paul and Ted Cruz in the Senate, and people like Trey Gowdy and Jim Jordan in the House.
Now we're all too familiar with liberal judges blocking President Trump's executive actions on immigration and travel, and today that song was sung again. U.S District Judge William Orrick, of California, issued an injunction that will stay in place until two lawsuits go through court regarding Trump's order on sanctuary city funding, according to Associated Press.
President Trump is really trying to implement his "America First" agenda, but he can only do so much by himself, and the courts are so politicized that some judges are acting on politics and not on law. Most of these judges come from liberal locked places like California, so that should tell you something.
President Trump will soon have the Supreme Court on his side, but that needs to come sooner rather than later.
President Trump not only has to worry about the Judicial and Legislative branches, but his own Executive branch as well. Those true to his agenda, like Steve Bannon and Steven Miller, are being pushed to the side while people like Jared Kushner, Ivanka, and former Goldman Sachs executives are front and center. Rex Tillerson and Nikki Haley seem to be sticking to Trump's plan though, which is very important given their roles. Let's not forget the many Obama admin hold overs that are helping leak intel reports regarding Trump, that are baseless.
The "Deep State" or the intel agencies are infected with Obama staffers who have been helping thwart President. Those who wish to do him harm want globalism to survive and for the status quo to survive, which the election of Donald Trump threatened and is on his way to destroy. These people do not want America First, they want globalism and more money for themselves.
President Trump needs to fight his way through this hell and stick to his base. Trump needs to listen to those who got him elected, use the law to his advantage, and have the ones loyal to him help him accomplish this. Eventually Congress will have no choice, but to listen and then the swamp can finally be drained, because the alligators have all made themselves noticeable.
President Obama's former national security adviser, Susan Rice, was the one who requested that Trump transition members names, and even President Trump, to be unmasked in surveillance reports. This is according to Fox News.
This is quite the scandal, a real one, unlike the Trump-Russia fiction story. Susan Rice requested unmasking of US citizens that were "caught up" in surveillance of foreign entities. This is more than likely an illegal act, due to the fact, Devin Nunes stated this had nothing to do with the Russian investigation.
Why does that investigation matter? Unmasking wouldn't be a big deal if it were part of a criminal or national security investigation, but Nunes didn't seem to think it was, at least pertaining to Russia that is. This is starting to sound like it may be tied to the FISA warrant obtain to surveil a server "connected" to a Russian bank, after a previous FISA warrant request was denied for requesting multiple Trump associates and Trump himself.
To read more about the events leading up to this, read this previous Pulsar post.
According to Circa, White House logs showed Susan Rice was behind the mask of the unmasking case. The article stated that computer logs showed Susan Rice accessed intelligence reports, some that had to do with Trump and his team, in Obama's last seven months.
The article also stated that the unmasking began in July 2016, right around the first FISA request, and accelerated after Trump won the Presidential election. This could also mean Rice was behind the disseminating of the surveillance reports between agencies.
Now according to The Daily Caller, Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) has called on her to testify before Congress, as she should. However, Rice may just plead the 5th the whole time, but her name is still present on the evidence pin pointing this case to her. Rice also said something that will land her in hot water, let's just say she lied.
Here's the video from PBS NewsHour of Susan Rice saying "I know nothing about this", when being asked about Devin Nunes's initial unmasking claims:
Susan Rice has dug herself into a pretty deep hole here. First she committed an act that appears politically motivated, but that isn't confirmed yet. Second she went on camera and lied about it by saying she knew nothing about what Devin Nunes was talking about. Rice can plead the 5th all she wants, but the evidence is there, and if this case turns criminal, she may end up behind bars.
Also let's remind ourselves that no evidence exist that Trump and Russia colluded with Russia to win the Presidential election. When people say it's risky to bet against Donald Trump, they aren't kidding you, it is never safe to bet against Trump. President Trump's claims of surveillance during his campaign are looking to be more and more true everyday.
Pulsar will continue to stay on this story all the way until the case is closed. The evidence continues to mount in favor of the President and against the Obama administration. For all we know, the Obama administration and the Clinton campaign may have colluded to derail the Trump campaign. Since that failed, it was up to the Obama administration to derail Trump's transition team, and then finally make sure all surveillance reports can be copied and shard throughout agencies to bite the Trump presidency.
Stay tuned, the engine has only just fired up.
Devin Nunes, Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, has confirmed that members of the Trump transition team and possibly President Trump himself were caught up in surveillance. Nunes stated it appears to have been "incidental", but some names were "unmasked" in intelligence reports.
This news is coming to us just days after the InfoWars report on the NSA's Project Dragnet which had Trump, Trump family, Trump employees, and numerous addresses included in the mass surveillance from 2004 to 2009. According to Fox News, Trump's transition team was "caught-up" in surveillance coincidentally from November to January.
This revelation throws a large wrench in the small tire of the critics of the President's "wiretapping" claim. Nunes wasted no time personally notifying President Trump at the White House, and according to Politico, President Trump feels "somewhat vindicated".
Here's a video from Fox News on what David Nunes had to say:
A few things to point out here. One, what Nunes read had to be such a bombshell he literally wasted zero time on getting this information straight to the President. Two, it left the top ranking democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, Adam Schiff, clearly upset with Nunes for not bringing the information to the committee first.
Let's stick with two real quick, why would Schiff be upset with Nunes? It's not that Nunes is a republican, it's because Schiff and others couldn't pressure Nunes on keeping this silent, at least for the time being. Maybe Nunes knew that as well, and wanted to make sure President Trump saw what he saw. Schiff isn't the only one, leftists from Congress to the media are upset.
Alright, number three here is according to Grabien News where the FBI is not cooperating with the House Intelligence Committee, but the NSA is. That seems a bit fishy, does it not?
We more than likely can expect more to come out on this, and with this bombshell it looks as if Trump is going to be the right one on all this. This "incidental" surveillance of the Trump transition team happened on Obama's watch.
Nunes did say the surveillance appears to be legal and it looks to have been approved by a FISA court, but the unmasking of the names of Trump associates, and maybe Trump himself, which is not legal. Nunes was concerned also because the intel reports "ended up in reporting channels and was widely disseminated" according to Fox News.
At the end of the day this is not good for our country and should raise concern over the "deep state", and the efforts of democrats and Trump opponents to take down President Trump. Stay tuned because the tide is turning.
Released last night via InfoWars and posted on Drudge Report for the past 24 hours, NSA documents proving surveillance on Donald Trump for at least five years. All information cited below will be from that InfoWars article.
Joe Arpaio, former sheriff of Maricopa Country in Arizona, and the chief investigator of the Cold Case Posse Michael Zullo have came across many documents showing that Donald Trump was under NSA surveillance from 2004-2009.
Project Dragnet was electronic surveillance of U.S citizens which really came to light thanks to Edward Snowden in 2013, but just now have documents came to light about Trump being surveilled.
Arpaio and Zullo have found information that has multiple Trump addresses, family members, and Trump employees that were all placed under electronic surveillance. Including Trump Tower, a total of 18 businesses, hotels, and casinos were targeted in Project Dragnet.
Family members include, but may not be limited to, Ivanka and the article cited a former wife of President Trump, one could maybe guess Marla Maples.
Now you're probably sitting there thinking that this was a while ago and is done and over with. It started in 2004 with the Bush Administration and it appears in 2009 the Obama Administration pulled the plug on it, goes to show how squeaky clean Trump and his organization really are.
This is also goes to show that if at one point Trump was under surveillance, what could stop him from being placed under surveillance again? It took until 2013 for Dragnet, and many other illegal NSA projects, to be spotlighted. The technology and methods are still there and have probably only gotten better.
So what does this prove? It proves at one point Trump was surveilled by the NSA, so what makes you think he wasn't prone to any more surveillance? Is it just a coincidence that multiple media outlets like The New York Times reported on "wiretapping" and "surveillance" of Trump and Trump aides?
Yeah the Obama Administration may have ended his 2004-2009 surveillance, but someone somewhere could have opened that back up, obviously the media knows about something.
Here's the full report from Alex Jones:
Say what you want about Alex Jones, but he is the farthest from "Fake News" you can get, he really speaks truth. Watch his show for yourself and do some research.
Interestingly, this all came out on the eve of FBI director Comey and NSA director Rogers House Intelligence Committee hearing. In this hearing Comey and Rogers stated there is no evidence of Trump and Russia collusion, but the investigation is still "on going".
Comey then stated that there isn't any evidence that Trump Tower was "wiretapped" by the Obama administration, but there is still an investigation into it. So how can there be an on-going investigation into "wiretapping" or "surveillance" of President Trump and Trump Tower, but no evidence that anything occurred?
Here's a video of Comey's statements on this per Fox 10 Phoenix:
What makes this all more spooky is that with there being a leaker, or leakers, leaking information throughout federal agencies, that just so happened got their restrictions on sharing information loosened up by President Obama. Transcripts of Former National Security Secretary Michael Flynn phone calls with the Russian Ambassador were leaked to the media by someone who had connections with someone who has access to surveillance information. Comey would not answer if he briefed President Obama on Flynn's phone call with the Russian Ambassador (call occurred during Trump transition period).
This is all pretty serious and spooky stuff.
A warrant was granted to surveil a server in Trump Tower that was connected to a Russian bank, but that was all squeaky clean, from the warrant to the business going on with Trump Tower and that Russian bank. There was a FISA warrant request on Trump aides that was supposedly denied, but then it with Project Dragnet being out there, did the "deep state" just go under the radar of the courts and Congress? Someone under the order of someone in the Obama Administration had to carry out this surveillance, unless persons in the intel agencies went rogue.
The President has every right to be concerned, though he should have waited and pinpointed his accusations, but is doing the right thing by letting Congress solve the problem while he can run the country. Project Dragnet can help add fuel to President Trump's claim, but evidence from 2015-2016 is going to be needed to solidify his claims and solve the case.
Video source: Fox News
This past weekend was full of headlines, and of course, President Trump is at the center of them. On Saturday the President tweeted out allegations that former President Obama had his administration wiretap the phones at Trump Tower.
Now if you kept up with the Obama administration you may have noticed it wasn't so squeaky clean. The Obama administration had its fare share of scandals, with surveillance being one of them. President Trump may know more than he can tell the public at the moment, or he simply wants to dig deeper into some evidence he came across which blew this whole story.
According to The Sun, the FBI obtained a warrant to conduct surveillance on four people close to the Trump campaign. However that was the second attempt at having a FISA court grant the warrant, so it makes you think why the first attempt was blocked. It also raises the question of any fine print within the warrant that was granted, say if those four people had business being in Trump Tower, that may have been included within the warrant.
Even if there were no fine print, what would have stopped the Obama administration from doing such an act? Think of what the IRS did to conservative groups under Obama's watch. The Obama admin, along with the rest of the democratic party, never expected Trump to win and never thought any of this would be a problem.
The real question is, who ordered the FISA warrant? Was it Obama directly, or was it former Attorney General Loretta Lynch? Former Attorney General under the Bush Administration, Michael Mukasey, believes Trump and that it may have came from the Obama Justice Department, per The Hill. Mukasey also stated that the prior Department of Justice may have really thought there was a Russian agent within the Trump campaign.
Kinda of funny though, because right before Obama left office he had the DOJ ease the rules on spreading information between agencies. A little fishy, no? Let's also not forget the mysterious wiretapping into General Michael Flynn, which ultimately led to his resignation after being leaked.
Below are a couple of videos from Fox News, first one of former Obama intel chief James Clapper denying the accusations along with brief analysis of the situation. The second is about the White House standing by the accusations with more analysis of the situation.
President Trump is not making this stuff up, like the man stated before he "don't kid". Press Secretary Sean Spicer himself said Trump had access to "very troubling" reports.
True or not, it shows how the deep state can operate, and by deep state I mean NSA, CIA, and FBI. These actions also make the case for government agencies being politicized. Again, this isn't Obama's first rodeo with this surveillance stuff.
Today WikiLeaks tweeted this:
There is more where that came from, and one could on guess what we just don't know. Sadly, we just do not know if President Trump's accusation and potential evidence will add up, but if it does, Obama and his administration will be in some serious trouble.
Judicial Watch added a little fuel to this fire by filing lawsuits against the CIA, DOJ, and Treasury over these leaks. According to Judicial Watch, after the mentioned agencies failed to respond to a FOIA request regarding records into the General Flynn wiretapping.
Multiple sources reported FBI directory James Comey told the DOJ not to investigate the President's claims, but those sources cited anonymous sources, so it make just be some "very fake news". Comey himself hasn't been quoted saying anything like that.
The Trump Administration needs to replace all Obama era employees and appointees wherever possible, they have a serious leak problem. The Trump administration needs to keep digging for the remaining treasure to make the case for wiretapping.
Rightfully so, The White House has asked Congress to investigate these accusations per The USA Today:
Representative Jason Chaffetz (R-UT), was on Fox News's "Outnumbered" today, and said Congress would take a look at this and dive on in. Chaffetz is the the chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.
According to Greenville Journal Representative Trey Gowdy (R-SC), who also sits on the same committee as Mr. Chaffetz, believes if President Trump is telling the truth there will be a paper trail and "we'll be able to find it out".
This whole situation goes to show the real power government has over the people of the United States. That should be what really spooks us, the American people, and we should be thankful we have people in Congress and the The White House that want to end all of that. We the people of the United States were (still are) having all our data sucked up by the NSA and maybe other agencies. Privacy is the biggest loser in the all of this, if not President Trump and the American people.
Trump has very rarely been proven wrong, and Trump is obviously not a dumb person, he knows what he said and understands the accusations. If Trump is right then Congress, the DOJ, and the FBI will all reach the conclusion, make the charges, and get some indictments. Also if true, this will just go to show everything about the Obama administration being corrupt, sneaky, and crooked will be true.
Pulsar Poll: How Did President Trump's Address to Congress Make You Feel About the Future of the US?
Video Source: PBS NewsHour