Does anybody remember January 20, 2017? I mean, I'm sure nobody can seem to forget, but does anybody remember a specific article that day? One belonging to the New York Times? Well if you don't, please see below.
Huh, I wonder where that "wiretapped data" came from?
Let's fast forward a couple months later to March, where former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Evelyn Farkas admitted on MSNBC that the Obama Administration did in fact spy on Trump. This was after Trump tweeted on March 4, 2017 about finding out "Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower..".
On March 10, 2017 Business Insider reported that the FBI was examining Alfa Bank because they were connected to a server located in Trump Tower. Now how do you think the FBI found that out? In that same article a CNN's "FBI source" is cited denying there was a FISA warrant for that server, but declined to answer if there was a FISA warrant to look into connections with Russian banks and the Trump campaign.
We'd later find out that there was a FISA warrant for the whole enchilada.
A nice little bit of information dropped in May 2017 by The Washington Times. That information dropped is that John Brennan, CIA director under Barack Obama, provided information ("piss-gate" dossier) to get approval to start their counterintelligence operation of candidate Donald Trump in the Summer of 2016.
Brennan worked with former MI6 agent Christopher Steele to create the infamous "piss-gate" dossier. The dossier was then picked up by John McCain, after Brennan, who then handed it the FBI. Brennan would tell the House Intelligence Committee in 2017 that he knew nothing about the dossier, but that they were gathering intel strictly related to Trump associates and their contacts with Russia. This was a lie, and is shown in an article from Law and Crime in February 2018.
Brennan is supposedly under investigation for those very comments according to Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) to see if Brennan committed perjury. Another February 2018 article, this time from Real Clear Investigations, details Brennan's perjury and how he and fromer Obama era Director of National Intelligence James Clapper dripped the Steele "piss-gate" dossier to President Obama.
Let's go on to September 2017, where according to Breitbart a report was released that showed US investigators obtained a surveillance warrant on Paul Manafort, and monitored him before and after the election. Now remember, Manafort was at one time Trump's campaign manager. After that warrant ended, a FISA warrant was obtained for the whole campaign.
Also do not forget that Susan Rice was busted for unmasking Trump and associates names within surveillance reports and documents, it's illegal to unmask US citizen's names unless those names are targets of investigation. Reported by Fox News in April 2017, ex-CIA analyst Fred Fleitz said "It's hard to fathom how the demasking of multiple Trump campaign and transition officials was not politically motivated."
The Deep State has been involved since Trump won the GOP presidential nomination in the Spring of 2016. They snuck their way in by surveiling Manafort and started sucking other Trump officials into their bag like a vacuum.
Again though to my earlier question, I wonder where that "wiretapped data" came from? It really isn't hard to figure that out, the above examples are three of many. Let's now fast forward to more recent times, bring it back to 2018 here.
Now remember, this whole time, there is some sort of investigation going on with Trump-Russia collusion based on a fabricated unverified dossier describing Russian hookers peeing on a bed where Obama sleeps while in Russia. Buzzfeed released it completely unverified, and it before that it was presented to the FISA court as truth, and that's how this whole investigation really kicked off.
Back here in 2018, we uncovered FBI agents Lisa Page and Peter Strzok (well former agent Page who is disgraced and "resigned") not only having an affair, but texting back and forth about making sure Trump didn't get elected. They failed doing that, but that didn't stop them. Their text messages detailed how they worked with Andrew McCabe and James Comey (both disgraced and fired) to execute a back-up plan to try and remove President Trump from office with the Russia investigation.
The juicy Page-Strzok texts can be read here via The Daily Caller: http://dailycaller.com/2018/04/27/read-the-strozk-page-texts-in-full/
Continuing here in 2018, we found out the FBI called their part of the Trump investigation "Code Name Crossfire Hurricane", as reported extensively by The New York Times. In that article they describe meeting with George Papadopoulos who was a Trump campaign adviser at the time. That was on May 16, 2018.
Let's go to a more recent date, May 19, 2018. ZeroHedge reports "FBI Spy-Op Exposed: Trump Campaign Infiltrated by Long Time CIA and MI6 Asset". Stefan Halper, a professor at Universtiy of Cambridge who has connections to not only the CIA, but United Kingdom's MI6 intelligence agency.
Mr. Halper was reportedly planted as a spy within the Trump campaign, and his mission was to befriend and spy on three individuals of the Trump campaign, most notably George Papadopoulos. Halper helped set up a meeting with Papadopoulos in London with Alexander Downer, a former Australian diplomat, and good 'ol Peter Strzok tagged along as a part of "Crossfire Hurricane". This is where Papadopoulos would drukenly say the Russians had Hillary's emails. How he of all people would know that is still a mystery.
Just today, May 22, 2018, Breitbart cites former Trump adviser Michael Caputo, who was on The Ingraham Angle, who alleges that more than one informant approached the campaign.
You know it's very simple really, it's very simple to figure out what all was really going on here. Why would our own government spend so much time trying to smear and destroy a political opponent? Obama and the democrats knew their legacy would be erased by Trump and the GOP, they needed a plan and a backup.
The main plan was to prevent Trump from becoming President all together, even if it meant exonerating Hillary Clinton, which Comey did before he even interviewed her in July 2016. The backup plan was for if Trump got elected, which he did. That plan is what we're seeing now, the Russia investigation. The investigation was maybe not solely meant to charge and impeach President Trump, but to get him to resign so they wouldn't have to bring any charges which they do not have.
The backup plan was in progress at the same time the main plan was, they needed to try and plant as much evidence as possible and create a narrative, and that same narrative to be repeated over and over again by the mainstream media. There is a reason President Trump calls the media the enemy of the people, fake news, and the opposition party.
Why do you think Michael Flynn, Paul Manafort, and Michael Cohen have all been targeted and charged with something? To get one of them to talk or pinch them enough to help try and frame President Trump with a crime. Flynn plead guilty to lying, I believe in sacrifice, to end his investigation.
Michael Flynn had is cellphone tapped, his completely legal conversation with a Russian official during the transition was eavesdropped, and in turn he was charged with lying to the FBI because he didn't report it. He was fired by President Trump because he lied about it as well to him and Vice President Pence.
Paul Manafort's case have been tossed out of federal courts by judges like T.S Ellis who struck down Mueller in regards to Manafort's case. Ellis accused Mueller of trying to pinch Manafort to try and use Manafort against President Trump. Ellis went on to say he doesn't "see what relation this indictment has with what the special counsel is authorized to investigate". Amen, Judge Ellis. This all can be found via Business Insider.
Michael Cohen had his home raided for all his documents and records, including those on his client Donald J. Trump. Cohen's investigation is very similar to Manafort's, nothing to do with Trump himself, but everything to do with Cohen and Cohen's personal life, more specifically his payment to porn star Stormy Daniels. The special counsel did that raid not just for their investigation into Cohen's dealings, but to obtain attorney-client documents regarding President Trump. This investigation will almost certainly end up in flames, much like Manafort's already is.
The deep state is panicking, the former Obama administration is panicking, the democrats are panicking, and the mainstream media is panicking. They know their house of cards is falling down, and all they can do is try and slow it down. It can't be stopped, and it won't be stopped, this house of cards will fall.
The media themselves show how desperate they are, and they're trying to spin this major spy and counterintelligence operation the deep state had going against Donald Trump and his associates like so:
These people take the American public for suckers. So once again I ask, I wonder where that "wiretapped data" came from? Well if you've read this far, you've already read the answer. That wiretapped data came from a counterintelligence operation orchestrated by the Obama administration, FBI, and CIA kicked started with a FISA warrant based off a phony dossier, written up by a former MI6 agent who gave that dossier to then CIA director Brennan and then DNI Clapper. Completely illegal and a complete violation of the 4th Amendment rights of Donald Trump and his associates like Michael Flynn, Paul Manafort, and Michael Cohen.
Roger Stone had some comments for John Brennan today on Breitbart, he said "John Brennan should pop the glass capsule and take the cyanide now." He continued with "He's the perp who started the entire Russian dossier matter. He's lied about it under oath. He's going to die in a federal penitentiary.".
Brennan seems a bit spooked, just yesterday he demanded Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell to help stop Trump after President Trump ordered the DOJ to look into the spying within his campaign and beyond, all of which has Brennan's fingertips all over it. Read more on this from The Gateway Pundit.
Wake up America. Remember Hillary's 33,000 deleted emails? Remember Huma Abedin forwarding, convicted pedophile and current inmate, Anthony Weiner classified emails? Remember Imran Awan, hired by Debbie Wasserman-Schultz who had access to DNC servers, destroyed hard drives, and tried to flee to Pakistan but was caught? Where is the DNC server that was "hacked", where is that investigation?
Donald Trump Jr. met with Russian lawyer, Natalia Veselnitskaya, back in June of 2016, under the guise of dirt on Hillary Clinton. Veselnitskaya instead wanted to push Trump Jr. to have his father look at the Magnitsky Act, an act that imposed sanctions on Russia and forced Russia to ban Russian adoptions to Americans.
That isn't illegal, now is it? Yes, Trump Jr. brought at the time Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort to the meeting, but remember it was under the guise of information on Hillary Clinton. Guess what, you're allowed to information on your political opponent, and if you don't believe that, you may not be the political expert you think you are.
Donald Trump Jr. has been transparent since the story broke, and he's been trying to make things as clear and right as possible. It's understandable that the dems and media aren't used to transparency, since both are the most non-transparent in the country right now.
Donald Trump Jr. released all his emails on Twitter @DonaldJTrumpJr, (unlike Hillary Clinton deleting 30,000 of hers), on this meeting and has agreed to appear wherever and do whatever is necessary to get this sorted out.
Trump Jr.'s tweets were not posted here due to the volume of tweets, please check out his account and read for yourself.
Here's Donald Trump Jr. on Fox News's Hannity last night explaining:
Want to know something funny? Eight days after meeting with Trump Jr., Natalia Veselnitskaya was pictured at Michael McFaul's hearing. McFaul was in the Obama administration, and was the US ambassador to Russia (2012-2014) and Special Assistant to the President. Funny huh?
What's even more funny Veselnitskaya was denied entry to the US before the meeting, but was let in anyway. Was it because of the above hearing, or was it more tied into a Russian set-up? Either way, the Obama administration ultimately let her in the country after she was denied a visa.
Also! Per The Gateway Pundit, Veselnitskaya posted a Facebook picture of John McCain inside McCain's office back in December 2015. Don't forget McCain is responsible for handing over the fake Buzzfeed-Trump/Russia "pissgate" story, and is no fan of President Trump what-so-ever.
So how about some real crimes and potential crimes? Like James Comey leaking classified information to his friend, for his friend to release to the press, in hopes of getting a special counsel created for Trump-Russia conspiracy, which did happen. Comey provided cover for Hillary Clinton and Huma Abedin every step of the way That's real news.
Yeah, Huma Abedin forwarded classified emails to her pedophile husband Anthony Weiner to print out, that is very illegal.
What about Susan Rice unmasking names of US citizens, caught up in surveillance, that just so happened to be related to the Trump campaign?
How about Loretta Lynch? Not only did she cover for Hillary Clinton (think of Tarmac meeting with Bill Clinton), but she directed James Comey to call it a matter and not an investigation, when it really was an investigation. Comey himself dropped that bombshell.
Oh yeah, Loretta Lynch is denying any wrong doing, like normal according to The Washington Examiner. Lynch is being investigated by the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Rep. Ron DeSantis (R-FL), chairman of the House National Security Subcommittee, is calling for an investigation of Obama officials for leaking classified intel. DeSantis has also called for the Trump administration to purge all Obama holdovers still working at the White House, this all according to The Washington Free Beacon.
Oh yeah, remember John Podesta? You know, the guy who's email got hacked and then leaked via Wikileaks, well Podesta actually has ties to Russia. Financial ties that is.
According to Breitbart, the author of Clinton Cash Peter Schweizer, is calling for a congressional investigation with subpoena power into Podesta's real Russian ties. In January 2011, the company Joule Unlimited received $35 million from Kremlin backed and Putin founded investment fund Rusnano, while Podesta sat on Joule's board and Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State.
Let's not forget Hillary sold 1/5 of US uranium to Russia in return for cash back when she was Secretary of State, and this was even brought up by White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer back in March. Check the video below to see for yourself, courtesy of InfoWars:
The democrats have more Russian ties than the Trump's or the Trump administration would know what to do with.
The media doesn't care about the real wrong doing going, they are the destroy Trump media. The joke's on them though, and at the end of the day the American people and President Trump will get the last laugh.
Let's close this article out with Natalia Veselnitskaya letting the world know she does not work for the Kremlin, per NBC Nightly News:
Kicking off this week, President Trump met with technology leaders. People like Tim Cook (CEO, Apple), Jeff Bezos (CEO, Amazon), Ginni Rometty (CEO, IBM), and many others such as the co-CEO of Oracle. This meeting was another example of Trump bringing people together to help get the country and government back on track.
Cyber security was a hot topic, "sweeping IT overhaul" for the federal government was brought up (well needed), and it seemed to have been a very productive meeting. It's no doubt that technology is and will be the industry power house going forward, but it digs deeper than that.
The tech leaders that met at the White House on Monday are some of the richest most well connected people in the world. Money and connections go a long way anywhere. President Trump knows this and it could be another reason he wants to work so closely with them, because those people have and will continue to change the world year after year.
Here's a video from the meeting per Fox Business:
Twitter and Facebook were no-shows at the meeting, but according to The Hill, Twitter wasn't invited because they didn't follow through on an emoji request from the White House. It just goes to show Jack Dorsey's (Twitter CEO) true feelings for this administration.
This meeting really boiled down to cyber security and education. Cyber security for the whole country, an update for government technology, and making coding a requirement for high school. The latter part is a great idea, and should have been done a long time ago. Coding is the future, and with the way AI is going, may be the only true tech job 50 years from now.
It's simple, to be competitive in the 21st century, your technology sector has to be a power house and the US's has been for decades. It's time to combine the power of the private sector and the power of government and use those resources for the greater good of all US citizens. The tech firms have the know-how, money, and resources and the government has the power.
Let's end this with a panel discussion on Fox Business summing up this tech meeting:
Video soruce: InfoWars
If Comey's testimony taught us anything, it taught us that President Trump is still squeaky clean. James Comey confirmed that the President never obstructed any investigation, President Trump was never the subject of an investigation, and Russia changed no votes in the election.
Of course this didn't satisfy the liberal media, they quickly went into damage control, all but Chris Matthews who seemed to accept defeat. Matthews of MSNBC conceded that the "collusion" theory fell apart, which it did.
Here is Senator Risch pressing Comey on how Trump did not order Comey to stand down from the Flynn probe per PBS NewsHour:
The loss column just seemed to pile on for Democrats yesterday, not only did Comey confirm President Trump is good to go, but he also dropped a bombshell on former US Attorney General Loretta Lynch. Comey stated that Lynch directed him to call the Hillary Clinton server investigation a "matter" and not an investigation. That is clearly a wrong a doing, and helps back up the theory Comey and Obama Admin got Hillary off.
Comey also delivered another blow to the left by simply stating most media stories talking about classified info and the russia investigation are wrong. Here's the video of Comey stating that, per PBS NewsHour:
Thanks, Comey for confirming the fake media.
Comey however put himself in a negative light. He confirmed that he leaked his own memo. Yes, James Comey wrote a memo about President Trump, didn't do anything official with it, got fired, gave it to a source within the FBI, who then leaked it out to the press. Yes, Comey was part of a deep state leak, and can make you wonder if he was part of any other leaks.
Comey on multiple occasions, used language like "if i were strong enough" and "cowardly" when describing some of his actions. That doesn't shine positively on him at all, and helps confirm why Trump thought he was incompetent.
At the end of the day Comey handed the democrats a loss, handed Trump a win, and gave the media a free for all on both sides. Of course liberal media won't concede defeat this easy, but it sure gave them a kick in the ass. Hopefully they wise up, start being professional, and get back to real journalism.
It would be nice if we as a country can get passed this charade, and start talking about and working on the real issues that face our country. America First.
Yesterday, President Trump issued a notice of termination to FBI Director James Comey. Comey himself learned at an FBI event in Los Angeles, and thought it was a joke per The New York Times. No joke, Comey, you're done.
It was well deserved given that Comey let Hillary and other powerful democrats off the hook, and even tried providing more cover to Huma Abedin and Anothony Weiner when he "corrected" his statements he made under oath in front of Congress last week. Huma forwarded many classified emails to Weiner to "print" out, but to Comey that's no big deal.
Comey's incompetence and shadiness led to his firing, no one is to blame but himself. Even the Wall Street Journal is saying it was well deserved.
At any rate here are the Pulsar poll results on the support of the decision to fire James Comey:
The No's have it at 52%, with the Yes vote at 34%. Out of 67 votes, it's sort of surprising the No vote won, but 52% believe it was the wrong decision.
James Comey had it coming to him, and even the democrats and mainstream media wanted him ousted, and they finally got their wish, but it was President Trump who fired him. Since Trump did the firing the media and democrats immediately flipped their script and scream "Trump-Russia" and "Nixon", and act like Comey did nothing wrong.
Maybe if the FBI didn't chase the non-existent Trump-Russia collusion and prioritize actual real investigations, maybe Comey's reputation wouldn't be so negative. According to The Washington Post, the FBI prioritized the Trump-Russia investigation over intelligence leaks, and "resisted" investigating the intelligence leaks.
President Trump was right, Comey was unable to effectively lead the bureau. Senator Rand Paul agreed with Trump's decision, and even agrees that the FBI/Dems are pushing a "huge myth" about Trump-Russia collusion.
Here's a video of Rand Paul explaining his thoughts, per Fox Business:
God only knows what James Comey will do now, but it sure won't involve the federal government. Julian Assange of Wikileaks offered Comey a job though, per RT, maybe he can take that.
The Obama Administration seems to have been the real meddlers in the 2016 U.S presidential election, due to multiple actions taken by Obama staffers and even the former president himself. The week to date has been very eventful regarding this story.
It is looking more and more like the Obama Administration was up to no good during the 2016 presidential election. Susan Rice has been caught unmasking Trump officials names, and according to The Hill, Susan Rice declined to testify to Congress about that. Hey, Susan if you have nothing to hide, then why won't you testify? More than likely because Ms. Rice has plenty to hide, and will sit in front of Congress exercising her 5th Amendment right.
Yesterday though, Rice's friends Sally Yates, former acting Attorney General, and former NSA director James Clapper faced Congress. Yates and Clapper were testifying on Russian and Obama admin meddling in the 2016 election.
Really all we learned from Clapper and Yates, was Yates saying she warned the White House about Michael Flynn and his ties with Russia, and that her and Clapper knew about the unmasking and leaks, but were never the sources of them, per Axios. Also per The Gateway Pundit, Yates and Clapper refused to go into any details about the unmasking and leaks.
Brit Hume of Fox News sums up the testimony pretty well:
Sally Yates though is the most visible in the snake pit at the moment, not only due to her actions and testimony, but Judicial Watch has sued for Yates's emails during her time at the Department of Justice, per Politico. Judicial Watch should have no trouble with that FOIA request, and if they do get Yates's emails, watch out because it may be a treasure trove of what truly went on during the Obama admin in 2016.
If the recent events surrounding the Obama admin and meddling in the 2016 presidential election, Circa reported that President Obama mined the NSA during the 2016 election targeting U.S citizens. Circa cites the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. The report suggests President Obama illegally searches thousands of Americans digital records during the election year. Circa states that the government conducted 30,355 searches during the 2016 election year.
That has some very heavy weight attached to it.
Circa is also reporting that Senator Rand Paul (R-KY), has requested the Trump Administration to probe on whether or not him and other lawmakers were spied on by the NSA during the 2016 presidential election. This spying would almost directly tie in with Obama ordering NSA searches of Americans during the 2016 presidential election. Senator Paul received reports that suggested he was targeted by NSA spying.
If the probe goes forward, the Obama administration may be in serious trouble and charges may finally be filed against not just the former President, but against all the snakes within the Obama admin. President Trump certainly won't shy away from Rand Paul's request.
As more and more information mounts of Obama administration meddling in the 2016 election, no information is mounting on claims that Russia and the Trump campaign colluded in the 2016 election. According to Breitbart, yesterday James Clapper confirmed there is still no evidence that the Trump campaign and Russia colluded during the 2016 presidential election. It's over lefties, your the real snakes in the grass, deal with it.
Image Source: Slate
It's clear as day, President Trump is surrounded by those who want to destroy him. In all three branches of government, there are people who want President Trump and his agenda to fail.
Paul Ryan, for example, is missing the mark on pushing through Trump's agenda, Mitch McConnell hasn't been much help in the Senate either. The GOP is the biggest thorn in Trump's side at the moment with the constant failures and feuds.
For crying out loud, back in October 2016, Paul Ryan said himself he'll never support Donald Trump. Listen for yourself, per Breitbart News:
John McCain and Lindsey Graham were so critical of President Trump until the President bombed that Syrian airfield, makes you think huh? Out of all things Trump did prior and wanted to implement, "America First", GOP senators McCain and Graham applaud Trump for bombing Syria.
Then you have the GOP controlled House not being able to agree on healthcare because the GOP establishment refused to work with conservatives, and Paul Ryan sold Trump a bad bill.
The Chuck Schumer and the democrats obstruct every single nominee of President Trump, and now are vowing to shut the government down over border wall funding. President Trump should let the shut down happen, but what's worse is, according to The Gateway Pundit Paul Ryan wants to delay wall funding until 2018.
In that same article, the Border Patrol Union president was not very happy with that report. It just honestly seems like there is a coordinated attack on President Trump by both parties, but there are those in the GOP who are with Trump. People like Rand Paul and Ted Cruz in the Senate, and people like Trey Gowdy and Jim Jordan in the House.
Now we're all too familiar with liberal judges blocking President Trump's executive actions on immigration and travel, and today that song was sung again. U.S District Judge William Orrick, of California, issued an injunction that will stay in place until two lawsuits go through court regarding Trump's order on sanctuary city funding, according to Associated Press.
President Trump is really trying to implement his "America First" agenda, but he can only do so much by himself, and the courts are so politicized that some judges are acting on politics and not on law. Most of these judges come from liberal locked places like California, so that should tell you something.
President Trump will soon have the Supreme Court on his side, but that needs to come sooner rather than later.
President Trump not only has to worry about the Judicial and Legislative branches, but his own Executive branch as well. Those true to his agenda, like Steve Bannon and Steven Miller, are being pushed to the side while people like Jared Kushner, Ivanka, and former Goldman Sachs executives are front and center. Rex Tillerson and Nikki Haley seem to be sticking to Trump's plan though, which is very important given their roles. Let's not forget the many Obama admin hold overs that are helping leak intel reports regarding Trump, that are baseless.
The "Deep State" or the intel agencies are infected with Obama staffers who have been helping thwart President. Those who wish to do him harm want globalism to survive and for the status quo to survive, which the election of Donald Trump threatened and is on his way to destroy. These people do not want America First, they want globalism and more money for themselves.
President Trump needs to fight his way through this hell and stick to his base. Trump needs to listen to those who got him elected, use the law to his advantage, and have the ones loyal to him help him accomplish this. Eventually Congress will have no choice, but to listen and then the swamp can finally be drained, because the alligators have all made themselves noticeable.
President Obama's former national security adviser, Susan Rice, was the one who requested that Trump transition members names, and even President Trump, to be unmasked in surveillance reports. This is according to Fox News.
This is quite the scandal, a real one, unlike the Trump-Russia fiction story. Susan Rice requested unmasking of US citizens that were "caught up" in surveillance of foreign entities. This is more than likely an illegal act, due to the fact, Devin Nunes stated this had nothing to do with the Russian investigation.
Why does that investigation matter? Unmasking wouldn't be a big deal if it were part of a criminal or national security investigation, but Nunes didn't seem to think it was, at least pertaining to Russia that is. This is starting to sound like it may be tied to the FISA warrant obtain to surveil a server "connected" to a Russian bank, after a previous FISA warrant request was denied for requesting multiple Trump associates and Trump himself.
To read more about the events leading up to this, read this previous Pulsar post.
According to Circa, White House logs showed Susan Rice was behind the mask of the unmasking case. The article stated that computer logs showed Susan Rice accessed intelligence reports, some that had to do with Trump and his team, in Obama's last seven months.
The article also stated that the unmasking began in July 2016, right around the first FISA request, and accelerated after Trump won the Presidential election. This could also mean Rice was behind the disseminating of the surveillance reports between agencies.
Now according to The Daily Caller, Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) has called on her to testify before Congress, as she should. However, Rice may just plead the 5th the whole time, but her name is still present on the evidence pin pointing this case to her. Rice also said something that will land her in hot water, let's just say she lied.
Here's the video from PBS NewsHour of Susan Rice saying "I know nothing about this", when being asked about Devin Nunes's initial unmasking claims:
Susan Rice has dug herself into a pretty deep hole here. First she committed an act that appears politically motivated, but that isn't confirmed yet. Second she went on camera and lied about it by saying she knew nothing about what Devin Nunes was talking about. Rice can plead the 5th all she wants, but the evidence is there, and if this case turns criminal, she may end up behind bars.
Also let's remind ourselves that no evidence exist that Trump and Russia colluded with Russia to win the Presidential election. When people say it's risky to bet against Donald Trump, they aren't kidding you, it is never safe to bet against Trump. President Trump's claims of surveillance during his campaign are looking to be more and more true everyday.
Pulsar will continue to stay on this story all the way until the case is closed. The evidence continues to mount in favor of the President and against the Obama administration. For all we know, the Obama administration and the Clinton campaign may have colluded to derail the Trump campaign. Since that failed, it was up to the Obama administration to derail Trump's transition team, and then finally make sure all surveillance reports can be copied and shard throughout agencies to bite the Trump presidency.
Stay tuned, the engine has only just fired up.
Devin Nunes, Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, has confirmed that members of the Trump transition team and possibly President Trump himself were caught up in surveillance. Nunes stated it appears to have been "incidental", but some names were "unmasked" in intelligence reports.
This news is coming to us just days after the InfoWars report on the NSA's Project Dragnet which had Trump, Trump family, Trump employees, and numerous addresses included in the mass surveillance from 2004 to 2009. According to Fox News, Trump's transition team was "caught-up" in surveillance coincidentally from November to January.
This revelation throws a large wrench in the small tire of the critics of the President's "wiretapping" claim. Nunes wasted no time personally notifying President Trump at the White House, and according to Politico, President Trump feels "somewhat vindicated".
Here's a video from Fox News on what David Nunes had to say:
A few things to point out here. One, what Nunes read had to be such a bombshell he literally wasted zero time on getting this information straight to the President. Two, it left the top ranking democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, Adam Schiff, clearly upset with Nunes for not bringing the information to the committee first.
Let's stick with two real quick, why would Schiff be upset with Nunes? It's not that Nunes is a republican, it's because Schiff and others couldn't pressure Nunes on keeping this silent, at least for the time being. Maybe Nunes knew that as well, and wanted to make sure President Trump saw what he saw. Schiff isn't the only one, leftists from Congress to the media are upset.
Alright, number three here is according to Grabien News where the FBI is not cooperating with the House Intelligence Committee, but the NSA is. That seems a bit fishy, does it not?
We more than likely can expect more to come out on this, and with this bombshell it looks as if Trump is going to be the right one on all this. This "incidental" surveillance of the Trump transition team happened on Obama's watch.
Nunes did say the surveillance appears to be legal and it looks to have been approved by a FISA court, but the unmasking of the names of Trump associates, and maybe Trump himself, which is not legal. Nunes was concerned also because the intel reports "ended up in reporting channels and was widely disseminated" according to Fox News.
At the end of the day this is not good for our country and should raise concern over the "deep state", and the efforts of democrats and Trump opponents to take down President Trump. Stay tuned because the tide is turning.
Released last night via InfoWars and posted on Drudge Report for the past 24 hours, NSA documents proving surveillance on Donald Trump for at least five years. All information cited below will be from that InfoWars article.
Joe Arpaio, former sheriff of Maricopa Country in Arizona, and the chief investigator of the Cold Case Posse Michael Zullo have came across many documents showing that Donald Trump was under NSA surveillance from 2004-2009.
Project Dragnet was electronic surveillance of U.S citizens which really came to light thanks to Edward Snowden in 2013, but just now have documents came to light about Trump being surveilled.
Arpaio and Zullo have found information that has multiple Trump addresses, family members, and Trump employees that were all placed under electronic surveillance. Including Trump Tower, a total of 18 businesses, hotels, and casinos were targeted in Project Dragnet.
Family members include, but may not be limited to, Ivanka and the article cited a former wife of President Trump, one could maybe guess Marla Maples.
Now you're probably sitting there thinking that this was a while ago and is done and over with. It started in 2004 with the Bush Administration and it appears in 2009 the Obama Administration pulled the plug on it, goes to show how squeaky clean Trump and his organization really are.
This is also goes to show that if at one point Trump was under surveillance, what could stop him from being placed under surveillance again? It took until 2013 for Dragnet, and many other illegal NSA projects, to be spotlighted. The technology and methods are still there and have probably only gotten better.
So what does this prove? It proves at one point Trump was surveilled by the NSA, so what makes you think he wasn't prone to any more surveillance? Is it just a coincidence that multiple media outlets like The New York Times reported on "wiretapping" and "surveillance" of Trump and Trump aides?
Yeah the Obama Administration may have ended his 2004-2009 surveillance, but someone somewhere could have opened that back up, obviously the media knows about something.
Here's the full report from Alex Jones:
Say what you want about Alex Jones, but he is the farthest from "Fake News" you can get, he really speaks truth. Watch his show for yourself and do some research.
Interestingly, this all came out on the eve of FBI director Comey and NSA director Rogers House Intelligence Committee hearing. In this hearing Comey and Rogers stated there is no evidence of Trump and Russia collusion, but the investigation is still "on going".
Comey then stated that there isn't any evidence that Trump Tower was "wiretapped" by the Obama administration, but there is still an investigation into it. So how can there be an on-going investigation into "wiretapping" or "surveillance" of President Trump and Trump Tower, but no evidence that anything occurred?
Here's a video of Comey's statements on this per Fox 10 Phoenix:
What makes this all more spooky is that with there being a leaker, or leakers, leaking information throughout federal agencies, that just so happened got their restrictions on sharing information loosened up by President Obama. Transcripts of Former National Security Secretary Michael Flynn phone calls with the Russian Ambassador were leaked to the media by someone who had connections with someone who has access to surveillance information. Comey would not answer if he briefed President Obama on Flynn's phone call with the Russian Ambassador (call occurred during Trump transition period).
This is all pretty serious and spooky stuff.
A warrant was granted to surveil a server in Trump Tower that was connected to a Russian bank, but that was all squeaky clean, from the warrant to the business going on with Trump Tower and that Russian bank. There was a FISA warrant request on Trump aides that was supposedly denied, but then it with Project Dragnet being out there, did the "deep state" just go under the radar of the courts and Congress? Someone under the order of someone in the Obama Administration had to carry out this surveillance, unless persons in the intel agencies went rogue.
The President has every right to be concerned, though he should have waited and pinpointed his accusations, but is doing the right thing by letting Congress solve the problem while he can run the country. Project Dragnet can help add fuel to President Trump's claim, but evidence from 2015-2016 is going to be needed to solidify his claims and solve the case.