Tuesday night, the first US Presidential debate kicked off. President Trump was fired up, Joe Biden seemed a lot more amped up than every other day we see him. Chris Wallace spent a lot of time debating the President and making sure the President didn't beat Joe up too bad. At the end of the day, President Trump dominated and it was very personal to him. It's almost like Trump was angry at Biden for something Biden did to him....hmmm wonder what that could be.
Anyways, what brings us here are the polls, and I'm not talking about media polls and think tank polls, I'm talking about Twitter and Internet polls, the real polls in my opinion.
What we're going to do here is take a look at 6 different polls, 4 twitter and 2 from news websites, all show a clear winner of the debate.
First poll we'll look at is C-SPAN.
Out of over 325,000 votes, President Trump won with 69% of the vote. Clear winner for this poll.
Next we'll take a look at Fox12 Oregon:
The blue state of Oregon, home of the communist stronghold of Portland, seemed to think President Trump won too. Trump winning 51% of the 6,067 votes recorded. Close, but the President wins.
The third Twitter poll we have is from @Politics_Polls. Verified? No. Heavily followed? Yes. Polls are commonly unbiased on this account as are their results.
President Trump ran away with this poll, winning 62% of this 370,000+ vote poll.
The last Twitter poll we'll look at is a snap poll done right after the debate ended, and I believe it was only up for half an hour. This is from @US_PoliticsPoll. Not a fan of some of the polls they run, but results are very competitive it seems on most of them.
President Trump crowned as the winner again, winning 48% of the 1,331 votes.
Alright, now let's take a look at a couple open polls from websites.
The first one I have is from Fox8 out of Cleveland, Ohio.
Another W for President Trump, winning 53% of the 6,400 votes recorded.
Last but not least we have a poll from a WGA America site, NewsNationNow.
This was a snap poll as well, not sure on the duration, but it was already done when I saw it yesterday, so it wasn't even active for 12 hours. At any rate, President Trump won that with 61% of the vote with 5,100 votes cast.
Of course there are more of these polls elsewhere, and majority of them show Trump did win. I felt showing 6 would make the point that people thought President Trump won the debate. These polls are open to anyone to take and that's what makes them, in my opinion, more real than others.
Hope you enjoyed this post, and stay tuned for more!
Both images are public domain courtesy of https://free-images.com/
Since I last posted, there hasn't been many Twitter or Internet polls that have been released pertaining to the election. However, there is one big poll comparison that can be made.
On my last post, the last poll I went over was a poll from @Politics_Polls, a fairly sizable account with over 150,000 followers. The ran a poll last week on "who you would vote for if the election were held today". Biden/Harris won with a little over 52% of the vote.
This week, that same account ran another poll asking the same question and the results are a bit eye opening. Let's take a look.
Again this poll is from @Politics_Polls:
That is a pretty big win for Trump there. It wasn't even close. What happened? Last week the same account ran the same poll and Biden and Harris won, not big, but they did win. Here I'll post it below:
Like I said in my prior post, polls will change, especially these kind of polls. Do I expect Trump to have the big of a result each time? No. Do I expect them to be close, not exactly, but I do expect in the coming months that one candidate will continuously win each poll posted rather close or by a landslide. So far, it's looking to be in Trump's favor.
Trump did receive a bump this week. During the Democrat National Convention, Trump's approval rating went up each day. Yesterday and today, Trump received a 51% approval rating according to Rasmussen Reports. Here's that tweet below to see the bump he received this week:
It's kind of funny to see the opposing candidate receive an approval bump during the party's national convention. What does that say about Biden/Harris, and the democrats overall? They have no message except Trump is bad, could that be it? Seems like it.
All I have to say is there is a shift towards the President, and we are seeing it play out daily. The Twitter poll I posted today seems to match the Rasmussen polls above. Let's see how this continues to play out. Stay tuned!
Listen we all know the polls the media puts out can't be trusted. The way the media skews the data makes the results always in favor of one party, and that party is the democrat party.
That's why I'm a huge fan of Twitter polls. Twitter polls, yeah anybody can take them, but that's the thing anybody can take them. With media polls the do more polling in certain regions and sample more democrats. I feel with Twitter polls and other open Internet polls out there, you get more accurate results.
I did this same thing back in 2016, and you know what polls got the election in 2016 right? It wasn't the media polls, it were the Internet and Twitter polls.
So Let's take a look at some big US political polling accounts on Twitter. The first two polls I'll show you are recent, and the last one is last week.
Let's start with a poll courtesy of @PpollingNumbers:
This poll doesn't ask who people plan on voting for, but simply who they think is going to win the 2020 US presidential election, and you see who's on most peoples minds, President Trump. I mean this is a pretty significant poll based on the number of votes and just the runaway victory the President receives here.
Now let's take a look at a poll courtesy of @USPoliticsPoll:
This poll finished just today, and it comes from a fairly large account (16.2K followers). The result here has more people planning to vote for Trump-Pence at 51.1% than Biden-Harris at 48.9%. Close, but does resemble that Spectator Index poll I posted about last Friday.
From the looks of those 2 polls above, and the Spectator Index poll from last week, the momentum and enthusiasm is on Trump's side. However, let's take one more look at another poll here from last week.
This poll is courtesy of @Politics_Polls:
This one has the largest sample of them all, but it is from last week. This one has Biden-Harris up by a fair amount, and is similar to the results that Trump-Pence received in the US Politics Polls poll above. Is the enthusiasm and momentum really on Trump's side? I still believe so, based on the polling from the past couple of days and the support the President has been receiving in the past couple of weeks.
This is why I love Twitter and Internet polls, they can always be different, but at one point, once more minds are made up and more results are counted, one option will start running away with the lead. That's what happened in 2016, some polls like these showed Hillary up and Trump up, but towards November everything started pointing at Trump.
We'll see in the coming months, but stay tuned to Pulsar for more!
With this week's Democratic Vice President announcement, the 2020 presidential election's script is nearing a finish and the cast has been selected. Kamala Harris, also known by her stage name, Heels Up Harris, will join Joe Biden on the Democratic ticket this November. Let's just be honest, it's Harris vs Trump now.
It didn't take long for the media to go bonkers with the whole "First African American woman Vice Presidential pick", even though that isn't true at all. Kamala is Jamaican and Indian, not African at all. Just the facts, folks, but the media hates the facts.
Those same media outlets also have been touting her record in the senate and as California's Attorney General, but they leave out the fact that her senate record has nothing to do with working class families or middle class America at all. Those media outlets also refuse to report on the fact when Harris was Cali's AG, she kept innocent men locked up in prison.
Don't take it from me, read these two articles, one from the Los Angeles Times and the other via Vice. Both outlets are pretty left of center if you ask me.
There are more stories out there to back that up, research yourself, but make sure you search on duckduckgo.com, Google will make it hard on you, or just ask me.
I'll be breaking down more the Biden-Harris ticket as the months go on, and trust me, there's plenty of baggage to go around for the both of them. It'll also be interesting to see how the polls change from here on out, and especially once the debates kick off.
In the meantime, here's our first major social media poll on the 2020 election since Biden announced Harris has his running mate via The Spectator Index:
It's looking good so far for Trump and Pence! Stay tuned for more polls I'll be posting and going over now until November.
We're not going away. We're exposing what truly happened the night of October 1, 2017 in Las Vegas, Nevada. We know, and it's time the rest of you know. Paddock didn't do it. The proof is out there, and the real official story has yet to be heard.
The evidence against the official story is astounding, and the proof that vindicates Stephen Paddock comes from SWAT body camera footage, high definition pictures of the Mandalay Bay after the attack, and a video from a man named Chris.
This man named Chris live streamed his experience after the attack, and he was just sharing the information he had and what he knew happened earlier that night. Please note that this stream occurred, according to the YouTube description, at 12:16AM Las Vegas time on the night of the attack. The attack itself has been over for about 2 hours.
According to Chris's live stream, more events happened 2 hours after the attack had ended. The video will be posted below, but lets focus on some snippets from the video.
These series of images we'll show is at around 6:55 in the video, what you're about to see looks like an explosion, or some sort of light anomaly from what looks to be the 32nd floor of the Mandalay Bay, and towards the area where Paddock's suite was.
See these three images here, per Las Vegas Shooting Archive:
Let's post the video here, and you can watch and decide for yourself. You'll want to start the video at around 6:45, but feel free to start it and let Chris explain what's going on at first. Watch from 6:45, then at 6:55 you'll see the anomaly. Again this video is per Las Vegas Shooting Archive on YouTube:
Throughout the video Chris hears several booms and thuds in the distance, and he's unable to locate their source. He also shares some information from people he knew at the concert and at Mandalay Bay. Let's take a look at some of those instances here.
Do you really think Stephen Paddock did this all on his own? The body camera footage from the SWAT team that breached Paddock's room shows that no windows in Paddock's room were broken. SWAT can be heard twice saying, "We do not have a broken window." and "We have curtains open on a window, that's not broken." The latter, is the window that Stephen paddock would have been shooting out of, the window next to the pillar in that room.
In that SWAT body camera footage, you hear nothing about evidence, you hear nothing about broken glass, expended shell casings, hell not even Paddock's weapons.
Could Chris's live stream be the smoking gun footage? Did Chris happen to catch police or FBI blowing the windows in Paddock's suite? What would you do if you were the police or FBI? You just wasted all that time zeroing in on who you were sure was the suspect, only to find out that suspect could have never of shot from his room. By then, all other suspects more than likely would have fled the area. Did they?
Another part of the "official story" has recently been blown away, they told you Paddock killed himself, right? He didn't. Not only does the actual picture of Paddock disprove a suicide (fresh blood, position of blood, and dry blood around a hole on Paddock's chest), but more police body camera footage seems to disprove that story.
The video below was released by Mr. Burgandy on YouTube, it shows a Las Vegas Police officer saying "suspect's down in Mandalay Bay 32nd floor, SWAT O.I.S (Officer Involved Shooting)".
It couldn't be more clear, the officer says, reading from a group message, that the suspect is down on the 32nd floor from an office involved shooting. Why would they lie after the fact?
Here is a little more proof that Paddock was killed by SWAT, the video below from UFO Hunter UK, shows the breaching of Paddock's room. In this body camera footage, you hear the initial blast from the breach, then another boom which sounds like a gun shot.
Strange huh? This video also shows some strangeness of officer's going into 32-134.
Still think Paddock did it? Still think there wasn't more people involved? Still think the windows were broken before SWAT breached Paddock's room? The evidence says your wrong. This evidence is all from official body camera footage, dispatch recordings, witness reports, 911 calls, police reports, and eyewitness accounts. This isn't a conspiracy, folks, this is a real cover-up.
Below are some excerpts from dispatch recordings via https://archive.org/details/Batch8-911-Calls/171001003519_(1175).wma. They show how police believed there were multiple shooters and that the shooters were using automatic weapons, and specifically belt-fed automatic weapons.
There are also excerpts that show police had other suspects in custody that night.
Paddock didn't kill all those people. He may have been involved in some way, but he did not fire shots from his room. The windows were not broken prior to SWAT breaching Paddock's room. Look to the sky that night, helicopters can be seen all around while shooting is going on, and guess what, they were never supposed to be there.
Witness reports, 911 calls, and dispatch logs all point to multiple shooters, either in the air or on the ground. So where'd they go? Maybe John Cullen of John E Hoover can help you out:
Thank you, Bartman, Shepard Ambellas, and John Cullen.
Well if you've been watching the news this afternoon, you'd think President Trump just committed an act of treason. Did he? Is Venus a cold planet? President Trump did not commit an act of treason, do not believe the hysteria being pushed.
President Trump is a deal maker and a damn good negotiator, so why would he insult and bully Vladimir Putin to his face? It's almost the same as when the other side was furious President Trump didn't call out and bully Kim Jong Un during the Singapore summit.
You simply can't bully and insult your way to a deal or peace, you must use your leverage and build a professional, business, and personal relationship. That's what President Trump does best.
Did Russia meddle in the 2016 election? The US intel agencies think so, but for what purpose? They didn't influence or change anything, so is it any different than China or Iran doing the same thing? Why would Russia risk more sanctions and other geopolitical problems just to obtain and steal information on US voters and candidates?
President Trump said this today, and it's a very powerful statement, one that the democrats and media hated to hear: "I would rather take political risks in pursuit of peace than risk peace in pursuit of politics.".
The United States and Russia have no reason to be in conflict anymore. The USSR is gone, and Putin knows it ain't coming back. Putin also understands the US has a bigger economy and better military, so what good does conflict serve Russia and Putin?
It would be in the United States and Russia's best interest to get a long, trade, and be allies.
China is the real threat on this planet. China has a much larger economy and a more powerful military than Russia does, and a lot more sophisticated cyber warfare branch than Russia does. God forbid if China tried starting a war or went on an attack, wouldn't you want Russia on the side of the good guys? Russia teaming up with China would be the worst thing ever for the United States, and I think President Trump knows that, and that's why he wants Russia on our side.
No one seemed to care when Barack Obama told the Russians he'd "have more flexibility" after his election. No one seemed to care when Chuck Schumer (D-NY) met and had fun with Vlaidmir Putin, and no one cared when former CIA chief John Brennan voted for the communist party in the 1970s.
No matter what President Trump does, the opposition will always play it as bad news and "treason".
Do you think for one minute Putin would admit to meddling in our election? If he did, what do you want to do about it? WW3, over a damn election? President Trump is mature enough to recognize it, and is driving straight through all the flak and political risks to have a better relationship with Russia, and get them on our side.
A lot can be gained in a US-Russia relationship, in terms of trade and military power. President Trump views Putin as a competitor, and Russia as a competitor of the US, which rings true.
Don't get lost in all the media and democrat hysteria, there is nothing to worry about. President Trump knows what he's doing, and he is smart enough to know, you don't insult or bully someone you're trying to broker a peace deal with.
President Trump didn't flat out agree with Putin's denial, he simply said Putin made a strong denial of the meddling claims, and President Trump acknowledged the US intel about 2016 Russian meddling. Here's the thing, the DNC server has not been reviewed by the FBI, so how can anyone know for sure who really breached it or hacked it?
People like Julian Assange and Kim Dotcom who claim to know who breached the server, say it was't Russia. Julian and Kim both have been asking to come forward to testify to and show their evidence, and what they say happened, is someone simply used a flash drive and copied files from that server over to an external drive. No hack no nothing. Maybe that's why the DNC server was never looked at? The deep state and democrats don't want the real truth coming? I guess only time will tell.
Check out the full press conference here, per Fox News:
Marilou Danley, the girlfriend of alleged Las Vegas Massacre shooter Stephen Paddock, has not been talked about, seen, or heard from in months. Where is she?
There's a lot of suspicious things about Marilou Danley. One, being Stephen Paddock's girlfriend, two is her player's card was found in Paddock's suite, and three her fingerprints were found on ammunition.
That's right, according to The Los Angeles Times, Marilou Danley said her fingerprints would probably be on ammunition found in Paddock's suite and home, and they were.
Per the official story Marilou was no where to be found the night of the shooting, she was in the Philippines so we've heard. Now that story kind of adds up because, Paddock wired $100,000 to an account in the Philippines a week before the shooting,per NBC News.
However, according to The Las Vegas Review-Journal, radio transmissions have been released where officers considered Marilou "armed and dangerours". There were three radio transmissions regarding her, after the initial finding of her player's card in Paddock's suite.
The three transmissions regarding Marilou occurred at 1:37AM, 1:47AM, and 1:59AM on the night of the shooting. They initially believed Marilou was in a Hyundai Tuscon with Nevada plates, and was to be considered "armed and dangerous". Later on officers claimed this was a false alarm.
We know this much, per The Gateway Pundit, there were two people in Paddock's suite at one point before the shooting. The Gateway Pundit released a photo of a receipt showing room service for two ordered to 32-135 of the Mandalay Bay. See here:
Was that dinner for two for Paddock and Marilou, or Paddock and someone else? Women's clothing was found in Paddock's suite, and a shopping bag from a women's clothing store was found in Paddock's van. That shopping bag is from a store called ANGL, which is a clothing store for women's dresses and other "trendy clothing". See here:
So was Paddock a cross dresser? I don't think so. Is that Marilou's bag? Very possible. Did Paddock have anymore women with him that week and day? According to dispatch logs, yes.
See the dispatch log here showing just that:
Interesting they blacked out the room number for those 3 females, if those 3 females weren't involved, why black out the room number? We do know from police body cam footage in Paddock's suite, that identification for a "Jenna Perdue" was found. So we have Marilou Danley and Jenna Perdue identifications being found in Paddock's suite.
Was Marilou there the day of the shooting? Did she get on a plane to flee the country in hopes of never being found or questioned, only to be caught? How come after Marilou's questioning, and the evidence found connecting her to Stephen Paddock's alleged plan, nothing has been brought forth about her involvement. She hasn't been put on any trials or anything.
Who were the other women that were in Paddock's room? Friends of Marilou? Hookers? More girlfriends of Paddock himself?
Could it be Paddock was in on something else, gun running or a patsy, and Marilou was debreifed and told to be hush-hush about it in exchange for immunity? Remember, windows in Paddock's room 32-135 were never broken prior to officer's breaching the room. Pulsar broke that down in two stories:
Where are you Marilou? Why don't we know more about your involvement with this? Why was your player's card in Paddock's suite, while you were in the Philippines? I guess we're going to have to find out one way or another.
It was a heated day on Capitol Hill, disgraced FBI agent Peter Strzok testified in front of Congress about his bias and handling of the Trump investigation.
He was grilled by the GOP congressmen, and of course, stuck up for by the Democrat congressmen. At times the Republicans and Democrats were going at each other.
Peter Strzok was very careful in how he answered every question. At times, he couldn't answer simple questions because he'd claim the FBI wouldn't allow him, but there was several times he'd say that, and the FBI would come back and say he was allowed to answer whatever question it was.
It's funny, because Strzok has claimed, and claimed many times today, that he was not biased and that bias did not influence his investigation. His text messages and personal beliefs completely contradict that. Whenever members of Congress would hammer him on bias, that's when Strzok would get the most defensive and visibly irritated.
Let's watch a few videos from today shall we.
First we'll start off with the complete exchange between Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) and Peter Strzok, and at the end is where you'll see Strzok get very defensive and irritated about his clear bias. This video is per C-SPAN:
Gowdy really let Strzok have it, and really hit the nail on the head. Strzok really didn't have a defense, but did his best to answer as carefully as possible.
To show Strzok's true bias, and to make him actually read that bias Congress, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) made Strzok read his clearly biased text messages, some of which Strzok said he couldn't recall writing or sending.
Check it here per Storm Scoops on YouTube:
The man clearly had bias, and to tell his mistress, and co-worker, Lisa Page that "We'll stop it" when talking about Trump becoming President is astounding. Strzok then sits there in front of Congress and clearly lies about not having any bias.
Rep. Gohmert (R-TX) told Strzok straight up on how he felt about him and accused him of lying. Sparks really flew from this meeting, see the exchange here per Fox News:
That exchange really upset the Democrats, but it needed to be said, and someone besides Trey Gowdy and Jim Jordan had to put Strzok in his place.
Listen when you're the lead FBI investigator, investigating then candidate and nominee Trump, and then President Trump, and you're texting with another FBI investigator about stopping Trump, impeaching Trump, and getting him to resign, you have bias.
After all these text messages came out months ago, Mueller kicked Strzok off the investigation, but Strzok said that his texts had nothing to do with it, but declined to say why he really was kicked off.
Strzok was also in charge of the Hillary Clinton investigation as well. Strzok is the one who changed the wording. Per CBS News, Strzok changed it from "grossly negligent", which would have almost ensured charges to be filed against Clinton, to "extremely careless" which gave Clinton a slap on the wrist. Comey confirmed that, but Strzok said he did not recall changing that language. How funny.
Listen the FBI as a whole aren't bad people, they do great things for this nation, but those in Washington D.C, and those running these investigations into Clinton and Trump, are extremely biased and corrupt. They clearly do not and never did like President Trump, but for some reason that's not big deal to them or the Democrats in this country.
Something has to give here. Strzok's mistress, and co-worker, Lisa Page failed to appear in front of Congress this week. Page claimed she didn't have all the documents needed to answer questions, but it doesn't seem like she wants to play ball at all. It feels like Page will crack under pressure, and she is doing all she can to delay the hearings and weasel her way through it.
The United States of America and her people deserve better, and they deserve honest answers. The house of cards is slowly but surely falling down. It's only a matter of time until someone folds, or evidence comes out where no one can defend against it.
President Trump is right, this is a total witch hunt. These people in the FBI, the Democrats, and Hillary Clinton herself thought they'd win in 2016 and none of this would see the light of day, well they failed, and Donald J. Trump is president, and we're seeing all this corruption come to light.
As Johnny Cash said in "God's Gonna Cut You Down", "You may throw your rock and hide your hand, working in the dark against your fellow man, but as sure as God made black and white, what's done in the dark will be brought to the light...". You're damn right John, God rest your soul.
In Brussels today, President Trump and other NATO leaders came to town for a summit. President Trump dominated the meeting.
President Trump, from the time he was a candidate and all the way up to today, has been a hawk on NATO. President Trump specifically goes after the defense spending of other countries. President Trump has time and time again poked at the NATO nations on their defense spending.
Check this graph out detailing the defense spending of each country in NATO, per ZeroHedge:
How is that only five, yes five, out of the 28 meet the requirement of 2%? Out of all countries involved, how is Greece second to the US? The UK falls in third, Estonia is fourth, and Poland is fifth.
Estonia and Poland have great reason to meet the requirement since they'd be the most threatened by Russia. So what about the other nations? That's what President Trump set out to answer today.
President Trump really went after Germany, because Germany pays very little in defense, but make billion dollar deals with Russia.
Here's a video from NBC News showing President Trump's argument against Germany's defense spending and Russian dealings:
President Trump does have a point. Germany is barely spending any money on NATO, while making billion dollar deals with the country NATO was set up to defend against.
Per Yahoo!, President Trump asked all NATO leaders to increase their defense spending to 4% to match the US's defense spending.
It really isn't fair that the United States is spending the most, more than twice as much to protect Europe from Russia. The same countries who claim they're against Russia, or think President Trump has Russian ties, make deals with Russia and barely spend any money to defend against Russia. It's a joke.
President Trump knows it's not in the US's best interest to cut defense spending, but he knows it's not in the US's best interest to keep footing the majority of NATO's bill. America First.
Europe thinks they can play President Trump, but with the on-going trade disputes, and spending the most by far in NATO, Trump has all the leverage. The EU should play ball. Why should the US protect an entire continent from one nation, if that entire continent isn't going to contribute their fair share?
The NATO leaders talked a big game before the meeting, but President Trump clearly won the day.
The Windows Were Not Broken Before Paddock's Room was Breached Part 2. Again, Thank You, Shepard and Cullen
Still think Paddock did it on his own, huh? Still think all victims of the Las Vegas Shooting were shot and killed from room 32-135 of the Mandalay Bay, huh? Still believe the official story, huh?
The amount of evidence against the official story is outstanding. One single body camera on one of Las Vegas's finest blows the official story out of the water.
Now if you have read the part 1 of this story, you'd be up to speed, and have a pretty good idea on what really happened that night. You'd see, and if watched John E. Hoover's videos and read Intellihub, that no windows were ever broken prior to Las Vegas Police breaching Paddock's Mandalay Bay suite.
Let's break this down one more time. You're part of the Las Vegas Police strike team tasked with breaching Paddock's suite and taking down the shooter. You manage to get to the room, and boom, you breach the room. Next thing you know, Paddock is on the ground dead, guns and ammo everywhere, and you think you accomplished the objective.
So you start sweeping the room gathering evidence and checking for clues, and you then notice that no windows in Paddock's room are broken. An officer, whose name from what we believe is Corey, says these words: "We do not have a broken window." and "Standby we have curtains open on a window that's not broken.". Another officer can be heard saying, "It's not! It's not! It's not! Corey, it's not, no it's not.".
This "Corey" fella, whose name can be heard multiple times on the officer's body camera, is no where to be found on the preliminary FIT report. So who was this "Corey" fella, who stated more than once that windows are not broken? John Cullen of John E. Hoover on YouTube can help you understand:
Is Corey a "government fixer"? Why wouldn't he be on any reports regarding the breaching and sweeping of Paddock's suite, but can clearly be heard on an officer's body cam?
Back to the windows. Some may say, well that body cam footage doesn't show all the windows in Paddock's suite. Correct, but it shows the one, and the only one that counts.
Before an officer exclaims to Corey that the window is not broken, they tell an officer to check the window by the pillar. The window by the pillar is the window that was broken, and its image is now etched into the official story. In Intellihub's initial story on this, and John E Hoover's initial video on this, we see that the window is not broken, and Corey and another officer confirm that window is not broken.
Here is another John E Hoover video on this in case you need a refresher:
Now let's pivot for a moment, say the window was broken, why would an officer walk over to the window next to the pillar and stand on broken glass and shell casings? Wouldn't you want to be more careful with evidence, aren't officers and investigators supposed to leave evidence undisturbed until the investigation at the scene is concluded? Why would an officer carelessly walk on and over evidence?
Like the evidence pictured here at that exact same window:
It's almost like that window was never broken prior to breaching, and they were simply checking to see if it was broken because the curtain was in a position like it was being looked out of or moved. The officer moved the curtain to find that the window was not broken, and officer Corey confirms that.
Compare these two photographs, one with the broken windows taken the day after the massacre, and the other taken the night of the massacre. Notice anything?
Yes, the one on the right may be a little small. Click to enlarge it, and look to where 32-135 should be, do you see any indication that windows are broken? You do not see any lights at all, and if windows were broken, the lights from those rooms would be easily noticeable since Mandalay's windows are tinted.
For the record, the picture on the right was taken after the shooting. Check the source for the full picture.
Why does it seem like we're being lied to? Is it because we are? Is it because Las Vegas Police breached Paddock's room, Paddock is dead, guns everywhere, ammo everywhere, but no broken windows? No broken windows means Paddock couldn't have been the shooter.
You just wasted all your time zeroing in on Paddock to take him down, sure he is the main suspect, just to find out he wasn't. What would you do? A true independent and moral person would tell the truth, so were the officer's pressured? Is the deep state involved here?
Also, the silence after the officers confirm there is no broken windows is very telling. You can tell they're shocked and not sure what to do.
In one of the John E Hoover videos, when the officers breach Paddock's room, you hear a bang then "nice shot". Nice shot? I thought Paddock killed himself? More and more evidence shows that officer's, and Jesus Campos, engaged Paddock. Here's a tweet from @intellihubnews that shows this:
The blood coming from Paddock's head doesn't add up with the suicide, and look at his chest, that looks like a hole with blood around it. It looks dry as the blood coming from his head looks very fresh, also there isn't much blood coming from his head after a gunshot wound. Per the body cam footage, they didn't take photos that quickly.
Also, how is that rifle over his left leg? Kind of looks placed, don't it? I mean was he standing with his foot underneath the bi-pod area when he was killed? Even if that was the case, wouldn't the rifle have moved when he fell to the ground?
So what's going on here? Why are there still more questions than answers 9 months later?
If Paddock wasn't the shooter, which he couldn't have been since the windows weren't broken, then who was? Answer, look in the sky on the videos that night. Answer, listen to the 911 calls and read the witness reports talking about multiple shooters up and down the Las Vegas strip.
Check some my findings from this batch of 911 calls that night:
Need any more findings or proof, check out this old Pulsar post on the witness statements from that night.
Did the authorities falsify evidence? If so, they could be in some serious trouble. We're gathering the proof, but don't hold your breath on prosecution.
See you don't hear this stuff from the Las Vegas Police, Clark County Sheriff, or the FBI. They fed you their "official story" and have fought tooth and nail not to let any information out, but they failed. Regular citizens have blown the top off this investigation and the truth is coming out. We can't be stopped.
One day the real story will be brought to the masses, but sadly, that day seems far away. We're doing our part, now do your part and share this and any other Las Vegas Shooting video/story you can find.
The windows in Paddock's suite were not broken, who was the shooter(s)? They were in the sky and on the ground. Paddock gave them the cover to flee the scene.
Keep asking questions and keep searching, folks.